Well... I guess that depends on how you define "Guns." I certainly have not been convinced that the Federal government has the right to regulate any firearm. So the thread title was a misnomer to get you to click:p
However, since we have yet to have any evidence from the Federal government that the people that Obama has drone striked are actually guilty, we are constitutionally supposed to assume that they are innocent. That means that our government has unjustifiably killed all of those people, hundreds and hundreds of them. Adam Lanza killed 26 people and we're talking about gun control, how about some drone control?
The Federal government should be forced to destroy its drone arsenal. To that extent, we do need to control weapons.
Discuss.
However, since we have yet to have any evidence from the Federal government that the people that Obama has drone striked are actually guilty, we are constitutionally supposed to assume that they are innocent. That means that our government has unjustifiably killed all of those people, hundreds and hundreds of them. Adam Lanza killed 26 people and we're talking about gun control, how about some drone control?
The Federal government should be forced to destroy its drone arsenal. To that extent, we do need to control weapons.
Discuss.