The purpose of this thread is to continue a discussion that has largely usurped another thread (namely one devoted to which civs are "worst", i.e. least appealing to play in any given game).
Given identical settings and a similar opening gameplan, which faith-advantaged civ would you rather choose, Ethiopia or Celts, and why?
For the sake of discussion, the assumed settings are these:
Standard size map
Standard speed
All map conditions set to defaults
Pangaea or Continents map (i.e. no Archipelago or exotic map choices).
No mods that alter gameplay rules/units/abilities, etc.
If you want to consider settings other than these, please state this in your post so that everyone is on the same page.
Given identical settings and a similar opening gameplan, which faith-advantaged civ would you rather choose, Ethiopia or Celts, and why?
For the sake of discussion, the assumed settings are these:
Standard size map
Standard speed
All map conditions set to defaults
Pangaea or Continents map (i.e. no Archipelago or exotic map choices).
No mods that alter gameplay rules/units/abilities, etc.
If you want to consider settings other than these, please state this in your post so that everyone is on the same page.
